Author: ppadmin

        Friedman’s contributions in the areas of leadership spanned religious, political and cultural areas. His Generation to Generation (1985) provided a new way of thinking about emotional process both at home and at work. A Failure of Nerve is his attempt to challenge the seldom questioned assumption that human beings function primarily according to the position they occupy within the emotional processes of the relationship system, whether family, church or business.

        Leadership is stuck in the rut of trying harder and harder without obtaining significant results (p 3). The tension of leadership failure is the inadequacy of the social science construction of reality that becomes the norm for social analysis and which fails to account for emotional processes. He sees correlation between medical and institutional issues and paradigms (p233 – 247). ‘The batting average in the war against cancer and the batting average in the struggle to heal chronically troubled institutions is remarkably similar’ (p 3). ‘The same values that motivated people to do good work in society often did not seem to operate in their closest personal relationships’ (p 6).

        His work with families suggested that individuals cut off from their families generally do not heal until they have been reconnected (p 8) (cf Jesus’ healings that wellness comes only after reintegration into the community!) This reinforced Friedman’s conviction that leadership is essentially an emotional process rather than a cognitive phenomenon (p 13).

        Pietersen sketches the historical and hermeneutical perspectives of the bible and its interpretation: the early church (first three centuries), Christendom (Constantinian political emphasis), post-Christendom, the Anabaptist option.

        A major part of the book does a book-by-book comment of major content and perspectives of biblical writings. Two chapters focus on reading the bible for spirituality (discipleship) and mission. He strongly emphasizes the need for bible reading to be a communal venture, recognizing its prophetic (eschatological version of G-d’s shalom, as subversive (proclaiming the kingdom of G-d as against the kingdom of the Caesar), and as sustaining (providing and equipping us for the journey).

        Christendom is the concept of western civilization as having a religious arm (the church) and a secular arm (civil government), united in their adherence to Christian faith. This meant the church moved from the margins of society to the centre, and the bible was read in ways alien to its interpretation by the early church.

        I know: this is a book dealing with the church in Canada, but this review is carried in a United States journal, but the similarities of the churches on both sides of the 49th parallel keeps relevant the material written by both for both. The same questions apply to both sides: what is the role of Sunday worship? What is the place of the sacraments? What is the role of the ordained and what is the preparation required for ministry today? What are the lines of oversight and authority? (p 281).

        What the book is looking for is adaptive leadership and not technical quick fixes. No single model, or searching for the latest gimmick, but dealing with the target and citing examples of ‘successful innovation’.

        To there are chapters dealing with specific issues: rural possibilities, inner city dynamics, creation care, spirituality, leadership and young families. A useful approach is the sharing of information of organizations who have developed ministry options, program s and media resources. Eg there is a page of eight questions helpful in developing ‘resources for mission’ (p 266) for local congregations.

        Most of the essays in Evangelicals and Nicene Faith were presented at Beeson Divinity School, Samford University, Birmingham, Ala., holding to the confessional and unifying purpose of the creeds as experiences of Christian belief and identity; the book is dedicated to the memory of Jaroslav Pelikan, one of whose memorable statements was ‘tradition is the living faith of the dead; traditionalism is the dead faith of the living.’

        This volume deals with the historical and theological basis for a robust confession of faith today. Some of the papers have questionable perspectives, and this present exercise is an attempt to sharpen the debate by seeing interpretational problems. Eg its critique of the emerging church movement as embodying patterns of ‘Protestant liberalism’ (p 184).

        Pluralism is dismissed out of hand, and the church is said to have suffered by the shift from Christendom to pluralism (p 171)! Strange picture of the faithful, early church! ‘The creeds were dominated by the NT expression of the historical facts of Jesus Christ’ (p 173). How can this be held seriously when the creeds have virtually no biographical details of Jesus. An astounding claim is made: ‘The Trinity was taught after being revealed by Jesus himself’ (p 177). The theory of substitutionary atonement becomes the only atonement theory acceptable (p 191).

        Hall challenges us ‘Christians’ to take seriously the theology of the cross, a theology we have ignored in favour of seeking power. ‘It is the theological triumphalism of Christendom that must be altered if the Christian faith is to exist in the world of today and tomorrow as a force for life and not death’ (p 5).

        Historical Christianity—Christendom—has steadfastly avoided the ‘theology of the cross’ because such a theology could only call into question the whole imperialistic bent of Christendom’ (p 6). Christendom has opted for triumphalism, not for a theology of glory (theologia gloriae); the tendency in worldviews to present themselves as full and complete accounts of reality; this temptation infects every genre of human thinking, not only religious thought (p 17).

        ‘The ‘birth’ of Christendom brought about a species of Christianity that could be practised without any threat or hint of its being a process of identification with the one who was ‘despised and rejected’’ (p 141).

        It’s an old book but it remains relevant and readable on the origins of Judaism and on the Jewish world in New Testament times. The book begins at the Babylonian exile (586 BCE) at which time characteristics of Judaism emerge, and concludes with the destruction of Jerusalem in 135 CE.

        Foerster reiterates the factors common to all Jews, but sketches the various parties in Judaism (Zealots, Essenes, Pharisees, etc). The Babylonian exile is key to understanding Judaism: the waning of prophecy, the stress on the Law, circumcision and the Sabbath, and the emerging of ‘the three pillars’ (canon, synagogue, rabbis). The exile and the history of the next several centuries subjected the Jewish people to significant presses politically, culturally, socially and geographically.

        The multiplicity of political forces on the Jewish community is staggering; they were in exile in, or occupied by—in the 400 years period—by the Babylonians, Persians, Syrians, Hasmoneans, Greeks and Romans, each emphasizing different social and cultural forces. New groups emerged: zealots, Sadducees, Essenes, Pharisees. New historical paradigms and theological perspectives developed. Of special note are the ‘three pillars’: the canon of scripture, the synagogue, and the rabbis (teachers); there was a corresponding drop in the importance of the priests.

        Wright takes a fresh look at Paul, based on his Jewish roots, his Hellenistic environment, his attitude to the Roman empire and his reinterpretation of Jewish symbols and theology. The two major topics of this interpretation are Paul and the empire, and Paul’s eschatology.

        The traditional approach to apocalypticism held to G-d’s action in the demolition of this world and the establishment of something totally different. Eg the created order is divided into two, earth and heaven, in which the present wicked world is left to stew in its own juice while the saints are snatched to heaven to watch Armageddon from a ringside seat (p 141).

        In opposition to ‘rapture theology’, Wright carefully explicates 1 Thessalonians 4. The parousia is a court term. ‘It is what happens when a king is making a state visit to a city and he is thus ‘present’. As he approaches, the citizens come out to meet him, not to hold a meeting there but to escort him into the city (p 55). And the citizens welcome the king into their city—‘rapture theology’ has the people leaving the city, Wright’s exegesis sees a continuum of heaven and earth, not a dualism.

        Boyd invites evangelical Christians to look carefully at how they make political choices and invites us to return to the love of Calvary and the way of the cross for life in our pluralistic society. ‘If we are to take our society back for G-d, it must have once belonged to G-d, but it’s not all clear where this golden Christian age was’ (p 98). ‘America as a nation has never looked remotely like Jesus’ (p 90).

        The way this nation was discovered, conquered and governed was a rather typical barbarian, violent, kingdom of the world affair. The Doctrine of Discovery and its applications had its origin in the Enlightenment, not in scripture.

        The concept of power is key to understand the political options; ‘power over’ marks the kingdom of the world, and ‘power under’ marks the kingdom of G-d (lion power versus lamb power).

        State and church! Two entities in which we seek security. But Kavanagh is not so confident of that trust. The state has colonized the political imagination of Christians; we find it easy to assume that the nation-state promotes the common good, expecting salvation from that perspective and resorting to violence to defend them, thereby obscuring our identities as members of a different body, the body of Christ. The nation state is but relatively recent way of organizing bodies in space. What we need is a radical pluralism that allows for a plurality of states.

        And to keep our resources identifiable. The easiest option, eg in dealing with poverty, is for the church to mobilize new lobbying initiatives in the state legislature, rather than modeling Christians in a program of involvement, bypassing the people of G-d. The common good could mean the creation by the church itself of relationship in the community as opposed to advising the state on technocratic solutions to poverty.

        Cavanagh develops powerful metaphors to focus in the contribution of individuals: migrant, tourist, pilgrim, monk, and points out how easily we write people off as illegals; ‘the identity of the universal Christ is found in the one lonely migrant who knocks at the door, looking for rest (p 87).

        The Judaeo-Christian bible has wonderful material: G-d as caring shepherd, erotic love poems. But it also has blessing for those who would seize Babylonian children and smash their skulls against the rocks (Psalm 137).

        The Qur'an, sacred scripture of Islam, urges believers to kill non-believers, but also commands that enemies should be shown mercy if they surrender. In contrast, some portions of the bible order the total extermination of enemies—of men, women and children and even the livestock, with no survivors. Or lauds a suicide attack by Samson (Judges 26).

        The problem of G-d and the presence of suffering asks, ‘how could G-d let such terrible things take place eg the holocaust. But the virtuous listing of ethnic cleansing demanded by G-d is not an example of ‘why do bad things happen to good people?’ but rather ‘why does G-d drive his people to do worse and worse things to selected groups?’ (p 8)