reviewed by Vern Ratzlaff
The biblical book of Samuel is a book of political thought; it does not paint a flattering portrait of any of the work’s principle characters (eg Samuel, Saul, David, Absalom and a handful of others); no one party or individual is endorsed. In the pre-Samuel period no standing army was established and no unity of purpose or centralization of political-military power was achieved. No standing army was established and no enduring unity of purpose or centralization of political-military power was achieved.
No single stable ruler capable of asserting his supreme authority over tribes and clans often embroiled in blood feuds could emerge. But a supreme authority is the underpinnings of any human political order. This is why all political entities aim to organize a smooth transfer of power one leader to the next. Dynastic-monarchy offers one possible solution to the problem of regional continuity; the bloodlines of the king’s family provide a possible nonviolent transfer of power. Dynastic succession is the experience of the Samuel-era Israeli state as dynastic succession seeks to provide unity and continuity. The price paid by the people for this is the imposition of taxes and military drafts.
Read more ›